Hello Coralie,
You open the door, so I take advantage of it...
On another forum I frequent, the list of discussions is as follows:
- The first column is an icon whose design is of little importance but which is red in case of a new answer (already mentioned);
- the second is the title of the discussion with the possibility to go directly to a page in the case of a very active topic, if you click on the text you arrive at the beginning (as currently);
- the third is the number of responses;
- The fourth is the name of the creator of the discussion.
- the fifth is the number of views;
- Finally, the last column gives the name of the last participant and the date. The arrow that points to a "sheet" allows you to go to the last answer not seen (that's super handy), if all the answers have been seen, you get to the last answer.
If we take the current display:
We realize that there is not so much to add:
- the icon that changes color can be the arrow that points to the number of answers and by clicking on this arrow we arrive at the last answer not seen if it exists, otherwise on the last answer;
- by dragging the number of views below the number of replies, we free up the space next to the number of replies to indicate who is the name of the last contributor and the date of this contribution.
In terms of operation, there are sometimes several of us preparing a response simultaneously. But by the time he had written it, done the tests, captured, another had sent his own. It would be good, when we click on the "send" button, if the site informs us and presents the answer(s) sent and offers to send/modify/cancel our answer.
A quotation function would perhaps be interesting to be able to take up a response in whole or in part: sometimes there are several answers in a row and as a result it is sometimes difficult to know which message the answer refers to.
I have a doubt about how the spell checker works: I have the impression that when you write an answer it doesn't work well but if you edit it you have the normal functioning.
I put here a suggestion I made recently about the "Lynkoa Improvement" group:
I realize that I have had open questions for some time (a few years anyway) without answers.
I think it might be interesting to create a status like an "orphan question" to be able to somehow close these questions.
On one of my questions that was dragging on like this, I made a bogus answer that I validated as a good answer but I don't find it satisfactory: the question is marked as solved when there is no answer and leaving it open is not practical when you do a search on your questions.
A (relatively basic) user manual would be interesting, I see icons/text in the toolbar or in the border of the window whose purpose I have trouble grasping.
I digress a little from the heart of the forum but I think that's part of it: the groups.
This is a part of the site that seems to me to be underused because it is not very visible, misunderstood and a little badly done:
- not very visible: a reminder of the groups to which one is registered could be made at the top of the page, in a banner, above the questions. We could find the same spirit of operation: index of new participation.
- Misunderstood: When you see certain groups, it's hard to know where to ask a question, in the group or in the main forum. It's a bit of a forum within the forum;
- Badly done: when you open a group, you don't have a discussion list but all the discussions with the expanded answers, I don't find it very readable.
- Why provide "private" groups? I asked to be a member of a group a while ago (months or years I don't know anymore), I don't have an answer...