Hi all
Does anyone know if to designate a section according to ISO you have to annotate:
CUP A-A
Or:
A-A
It seems to me that the last one is correct
What do you think?
Hello
I have always annotated my sections in this way: A-A.
I just looked on the industrial design guide and nothing is specified about the annotations.
However, the sections present in the guide are once again in: A-A, B-B, etc.
Have a nice day
1 Like
Hello
The annotation "A-A" is the one that corresponds to ISO standards because writing "A-A cut" is seen as a pleonasm.
Have a nice day.
2 Likes
Hello
on the NF E 04-520 standard, it is rated A-A.
Have a nice day
2 Likes
Hi all
for my part, I prefer to write "CUT A-A" to be able to tell the difference between the cut and the section even if the drawing speaks for itself...
In addition, I add the scale of my view in the title; The information on the scale is therefore smaller than the title and not the other way around (see attachment)... it's just for the eye;)
A+
coupe.png
Hello.
I will rather follow Mathieu's advice.
I make all my cuts indicating A-A, it's indeed the norm.
1 Like
Hello
I HAVE ALWAYS SEEN OR NAMED THE CUP IN THE FORM A-A, B-B...
the few times I saw marked "A-A cut" is when on the drawing there was also a section, to differentiate the 2.
Have a nice day.
I would be in favor of designating them A-A (like matthieu.koch), knowing that the precision of section or section does not bring anything to the reading of the plans (we can see if it is a section or a section).
Kind regards
Bastien