Hello @ m legras
It's nice to thank all the people who contributed to this com thread to try to solve your problem and we thank you for it
But do you really think that this is the best answer, the one that is designated
have a nice day @+ ;-)
Sorry, big bug this morning, I had typed a novel to thank everyone and take stock of the answers and once published, there was only the first sentence and my message got through and validated as a better answer!! ... Nothing understood and in no way do I think my post is finalized. There are plenty of good answers in there and you just have to test everything. I hope it's as interesting for you as it is for me. A BIG thank you to all in any case
3 Likes
Hello @m.legras
"Anyone know how to uncheck the resolution of the problem? "
This is not possible, we will have to tick another "best answer" to replace it.
Kind regards.
2 Likes
I have a simple 2-step solution if anyone is still interested...
1 Like
Hello @tarikc24 ,
Yes, I'm interested. Especially since I'm on the same subject but for rectangular tubes.
I have a solution by surfaces following the path of the beam but if you do it in 2 steps, I'm interested !!
'Simple', effective and workable solution:
1) obtain the inner or outer curve (with 'projected curve' for example or intersections of surfaces). here I did it on the inside
2) Split the surface to be cut with the "sewn surface" tool and the previous curve (the inside of the tube)
3) "Thickening material removal" from the stitched surface to be removed. For safety, make it bidirectional and take more than 2x the thickness of the part; The advantage of this function is that it removes the material normally from the surface
FINITE
See PCs modified on one side in V2020
modif_cadre_01_-_barre_retenue_-_fab.sldprt
1 Like
The image of the modified part for those who do not have SW2020 (in green the intersection curve of the surfaces obtained thanks to the dividing line)
Nb: on the part obtained, the heel is heeled on the lower part. No simple solution in my opinion to avoid this geometric problem. The curve obtained in the first step should be modified to shift it slightly in order to avoid this interference.
capture_enlevement_matiere.jpg
Removing interference is not that complicated: redo the same work but on the outer surface that is interfering.
see the final PC
After checking, there are still micro interferences. If you want to be 100% interference-free, the best thing to do is probably to make a slight offset of a few tenths on the limit surface. (surface-sweep1) before removing material.
Small technical detail: As the cut is at the end of the curve, there will inevitably be deviations in real life. If you want to be sure of the geometry you would have to cut on a straight part (less beautiful on the other hand ..)
modif_cadre_01_-_barre_retenue_-_fab_sans_interference.sldprt