cj
February 25, 2015, 1:22pm
1
Hi all
does anyone know how to retrieve the number of plies of a SW2015 sheet metal part (the equation being in the properties of the welded parts list),
in order to see this number appear in a name of an assembly where this part is located?
plis_sw.jpg
bart
February 25, 2015, 1:31pm
2
Either add a column and bind the number of bends property.
Either add a note and do the same, link the note or column to the personal property
here "SW-*plis@@... etc.)
See image.
plis.png
By creating a custom property that calls sw-plis@@@sheet<1>@piece1.sldprt?
This property will then be visible in the nomenclature, but there must not be several bodies in the part.
bart
February 25, 2015, 1:37pm
4
This image may be more understandable.
-right-click to add a column
- double click on the top of the column to select the source
- Select properties from the list of welded parts
- choose "Folds"
plis_bis.png
cj
February 25, 2015, 1:49pm
5
in fact on a drawing of the part, no problem, I retrieve the data from the list of welded parts, On the other hand in the drawing of the Assembly, I create a classic nomenclature or I add a column with the custom property of the part, but even if I choose PLIS, they don't appear!
plis_sw-2.jpg
pl
February 25, 2015, 1:53pm
6
I believe that this is only possible by adding an annotation related to the part.
Failed, I tested my idea: it doesn't work, I can't link a sheet metal prop to another prop.
And in an asm nomenclature, it does offer me the "PLIS" prop but it remains empty!
pl
February 25, 2015, 1:54pm
8
This is possible by linking an annotation to the piece see here http://help.solidworks.com/2012/French/SolidWorks/sldworks/HIDD_SELECT_PROPERTY.htm
And you have to choose "Component to which the annotation is attached"
1 Like
bart
February 25, 2015, 1:55pm
9
Logically, if you are in an assembly, Sw takes over the ownership of the assembly.
To do this, I'll insert my related part out of my sheet, I insert my nomenclature by clicking on my part out of the sheet so that the table is linked. Then the rest follows.
But logically, with the right formula, it should be possible, as Lucas said.
1 Like
bart
February 25, 2015, 1:58pm
10
What if we put the bill of materials for the assembly, and on the folds box to the line corresponding to the part we insert a note by linking the property Folds?
gt22
February 25, 2015, 2:51pm
11
and breaking down the nomenclature
Decomposition of a sub-assembly or welded construction in BOMs You can decompose components of subassemblies or welded constructions into a BOM.
To break down one or more subassemblies or welded parts in a BOM:
Click the left side of the BOM table to display the Assembly Structure column in the BOM, if it is hidden.
Right-click one or more selected cells in the Assembly Structure column that contains a set of subassemblies or welded parts.
Select Breakdown .
Modified objects are marked .
It should work, right?
@+
cj
February 25, 2015, 2:59pm
12
In fact, when we put a bubble on the part, we can choose to bind the bubble to the properties of the welded parts list of Part1!
on the other hand, if I paste the note ($PRP:"Folds") in the nomenclature box, it doesn't work.
we see in the bubble the number of folds, but not in the Nomenclature.
If we force the BOM box, the welded part list is greyed out (not accessible).
plis_sw-4.jpg
cj
February 25, 2015, 3:01pm
13
error the bubble formula is $PRPWLD: "Folds"
but it doesn't change anything!
1 Like
bart
February 25, 2015, 3:07pm
14
If your note is linked to the component to which the annotation is attached, there is no logical problem.
bart
February 25, 2015, 3:09pm
15
I insert my note,
I check the box Component to which the annotation is attached, I click on property of the list of welded parts
I choose Plis and that's it
Then if I want my note to be in a box, I remove the arrows and I put the note in my nomenclature.
note.png
bart
February 25, 2015, 3:12pm
16
To remove the arrow see image.
flechage.png
pl
March 5, 2015, 12:33pm
17
So as I said before:
Possible in an annotation linked to the document, but not possible in the nomenclature...