Yes!
Given the many requests in MP for those who don't have the 2018 version, I made you a slowmotion. :-)
Note that with this method two parts are made with the minimum number of chips.
In any case, I fully respond to @Souleyb 's request because I provide him with the files that will allow him to get a good grade with his teacher.
(if the latter does not have a heart attack)
Kind regards
Hold on like crazy
I would like to know the file size of your parts
To compare according to the procedure used
@+;-)
Hi gt22
184 KB in heavy version :-)
PRT = 119 KB (SW 2016)
all software combined, 0 KB :D
At least for science, my file is 90 kb and 7 min because I was trying to make the file as heavy as possible... :)
Have a great weekend
@G is for me the best for now ;-)
For fun, by "using a SW trick (of which I have the secret...) "
the same PRT, without changing anything in the construction tree, or hiding anything = 107 KB
"May the dark side reign over the galaxy... "
For me, the best and in all honesty, is the one with the most faithful color
;-)
Too bad for me for the color because I wanted to show what not to do in design
I often see in pieces that come to me a multitude of functions that are useless because people complicate their lives or are super messy in their design
And then if the applicant still used the piece I made and his teacher asked him to explain why all this mess would have been interesting to see what the applicant could have answered.
Good WE
The first poster has still not returned from vacation apparently!
Hello guys,
Too strong the delirium for a poor play and on top of that the young person who posted the question no longer gives a sign of life... As soon as I get home, I make the play to participate... ^_^
@ac Cobra 427: don't you have the tangent edges visible in your 3D?
As a result, I had done the piece early in the morning "not very awake", sniff sniff...
but the size of the part is not significant, because depending on whether we use the separate functions (chamfer, fillet, holes), it allows us to have a possibility to modify the value or put the function in a deleted-state, or vary the design, etc...
otherwise I think we should drop this post "in oblivion"...
EDIT: But the real important question of this subject is: what did @ludo.mai mean... ????
Totally agree with you @olivier42. This is my cheat to lower the file to 90kB, I didn't use any drilling function:) I only did extrusions or revolutions (shame on me, but I thought maybe it would make the file heavier!? I had also made chamfers in the sketch, etc...) anyway, it was fun 5 min.
Have a good day everyone
it's funny, I redid it in 5 functions, and by opening, saving the file, then closing, its size changes: 88 / 92 / 107 KB ... weird...
And as the last sentence of a Mangalore (for the 88 kb) would say: "for the honor... "
;-)
@Olivier42, in fact I had left a comment about the fact that there were no more school holidays at that time and then I realized that the post was starting to get old (by the way I don't understand why it was at the top of the last activities).
I wanted to correct my post and in the middle I said to myself "pfff, it's not worth it" and I left my post empty as I still haven't found how to delete a post.
There you have it, the reality is less cool than the explanation given by Zozo_mp :(
This question is finally creating a buzz! ;)
Oh phew, everyone was wondering what had happened to you Ludo.May
We were worried, all that...
... Let's try to debuzz this subject now...
PS: I take this opportunity to tell Clémentine that I sent a pm for a question on my profile.
He will have managed to make people work in the end ;-)
