The view is cut off and I can't get it in full.
1.jpg
Hello
What is the version of solidworks and the version of the service pack? What PC configuration do you have?
Given the number of tabs you can see at the bottom, it looks a lot like a graphical bug due to a lack of memory, but I could be wrong.
Have a good day to you.
5 Likes
Hello, I'm using SolidWorks 2018, I have the Windows 10 configuration.
The version of the service pack? Where do I find that?
Hello
For the service pack version, in "help" then "about Solidworks" (see attached image). For the PC configuration, I wanted to talk about the processor, memory and graphics card.
Have a nice day.
a_propos_sw.jpg
2 Likes
Service Pack = SP 5.0
processor = intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700K CPU @ 4.20GHz
RAM = 32.0 GB
Graphics card = NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Hello @e.poncet_1
AMHA it's not a bug and anyway it has nothing to do with the harware config.
The display of a view is done with several constraints.
First of all, you should know that a view is delimited by the volume of the object plus a margin (the dotted rectangle that surrounds the object + an almost invisible white margin.
You should see what you have in your background, especially for the space that the very big number five takes.
If the frame is very large in the area of this N° it may come on top of the image of the object.
A bit like when you say in a lot of software that this image is on top of or behind that one.
Can you check these points please.
Kind regards
Hello
Zozo_mp, if it's related to the area of object number five (for example) then by moving the 3D view we should see the hidden part appear.
E.poncet_1: Can you do this test (drag your 3D view to see if the missing part appears)?
Have a good day to you.
1 Like
Hello @Rim-b ;-)
You're right unless, as I explain, "image N°" is in the display above the image of the object.
Yes to drag down ;-)
However, something troubles me because normally the light dotted frame is always equal to the object, it seems to me, but here it doesn't have it.
As it's an exploded view apparently: this would explain everything because the MEP considers the volume of the unexploded object and not at all the exploded object to replace the famous light dotted frame. If we were to temporarily remove the exploded it should corroborate my suggestion ;-)
Kind regards
2 Likes
Hello
Wouldn't there be a cropping of the view?
Kind regards.
Hello
Thank you first of all for your answers.
I swipe down and it doesn't change anything, but when I remove the burst my whole piece is visible.
In the background of the plan, the number 5 is not an image but a note and therefore there is no overflow of image that could make the burst disappear
And no, there is no cropping of the view.
Kind regards
Hello @e.poncet
That's what I was saying before (As it's an exploded view apparently: it would explain everything because the MEP considers the volume of the unexploded object and not at all the exploded object)
This seems to say that MEP is only done from the ASM with all these positioning constraints. What you can do is play with the format of the sheet for example an A0 and also on the scale in the MEP.
The scale in the MEP does not change the dimensions of the objects, but only their representation on the screen (such as zooming out)
Kind regards
2 Likes
Hello
Have you tried to redo this MEP on its own, in a new file, to see if the problem is still there?
Have a good day to you
1 Like
No I'll try
thank you the same