Hello
I have a coordinate system Rh (as a horizontal coordinate system to say that I don't rotate) that I would like to position in relation to a Bati (fixed) coordinate system.
For the positioning of this Rh marker, I would like to build it so that it is the equivalent of:
- a movement following an X-axis slide,
- a movement along a Y-axis slide,
- a movement following a Z-axis slide.
I was able to do what I want (see part attached to this post).
On the other hand, I find that the offset constraints I created are very ugly in the sense that the X parameter does not appear very clearly between YZ Bati and YZ Rh planes, the same for the Y parameter with the XZ Bati and XZ Rh planes.
Here's what bothers me about the screen print:
Do you have any ideas for the construction features related to offset constraints to be made up of axes along the x, y, z axes?
Thank you in advance for your help.
corps3ddls.zip
I'm looking at your file but for me if you're looking for a better representation I'll create the user settings to drive the offset values of the constraints (put in "hide" mode) and use FTA to create 3D annotations (3D dimension) visible.
For the first point "if you're looking for a better representation I'll create the user parameters to drive the constraint offset values (putting in "hide" mode) ", it seems to me that I've already put user parameters and I've linked them to my offset constraints.
For point 2 "I would use FTA to create visible 3D annotations (3D dimension)", why not even if at first, if I can do it in the basic workshops it would suit me.
Thank you for your help.
Hello yes OK for user settings.
With my user rights and the CATIA config I found nothing in this sense.
Look under :
Tools / Options / General /Parameters and Measures "Constraints and Dimensions"
Tools / Options / Infrastructure / Product Structure
Tools / Options / Mechanical Design / Assembly Design
Tools / Standards
You may have more options than me