You have to remove ±4* the thickness (±2* the thickness per fold) there you should get there. (23-3)+(3-911-3)+(23-3)=945 basically if you want it's ± = on the inside sides so in your case 20+905+20=945 so your dev is right....
thank you for your clarifications; I'm going to review my plasn tonight and maybe try to send them for correction to the folder, just to see if it's what it's worth and that for future plans, it's fair.
Folding, a vast subject. To make a good press there are x rules to follow. It is necessary to take into account the material, the fiber direction, the machine, the vee, the punch, the bending angle, the thickness ........ the rule is the sum of the outside dimensions + delta " L ". The delta " L " and depending on the vee, thickness, bending angle, punch. To find them I attach a table which should normally be the one on your machine but tampis the one will do.
Wow, indeed there is something to have fun with, and to understand even better. I'm the type of person who assimilates drawings or videos better than texts that are too long. but thanks to those who in the background (of texts) too.
It's clearer in my mind, knowing that I'm going to put these docs aside, for my future cases.
I'm going to do a few applications tonight if I have time, just to assimilate all this.
Thanks to you guys, you're great, but you knew that, didn't you?
I know that the folding rules are very difficult and it really depends on the folding machine used.
Is it done in-house or is it outsourced externally? For my part, the parts are subcontracted and in this case, I don't put the unfolded of my parts. It's up to the folder to put the dimensions he needs according to his material, but I attach a step of my parts so that he doesn't have to redraw everything if he needs to start from a 3D.
Then if it's done internally then you should see the board associated with the folding machine used, as indicated by Obi Wan. In solidworks, you can indicate the bend loss instead of the bend factor. I've never used it but let's see if your unfolded follows properly afterwards.
Just I would like to react to what @nathalie-1 said, she is right, if you subtract, don't give development, it's her problem. If you give a devellopè you engage your responsibility in case of a bad part he will say that it is your fault, don't forget you order a finished part the way to make it is up to him.
If we follow this principle, it would give 100-8+100-16+100-8 = 268mm
I'll pay you cherries if you manage to make a U of 100+100+100 with a developed of 268. I'd like to see the result.
We are subcontractors in bending and I deter when a customer gives me a false press. The best way to be sure of the unfolded is to give the desired dimensions to the folder so that he can do the press himself or to make a good press directly =)
On 8mm I agree but up to 5mm it's +- in inner ribs to 5 tenths and these tenths are ridiculous because if the sheet metal is harder you will have a smaller radius so you will lack material and if it is more molten you will have a larger radius and extra material.... And moreover the material tolerances are at chi... because you can very well be delivered in 3mm or 2.8 or 3.2 and it's still within the norm...
Yes, I have my cuts and piages done by a specialized company, that's why the manager told me that my devellopés were fake. I imagine that he must return the DXF files before giving this in prod..
For the rest, I will indeed not send any more developers. I'll see if it disturbs him or not. I thought it was a lower quote, since he has nothing to do... but maybe not.....
I'm going to see this detail with him directly.
But what I'm going to do from now on is to dimension the inside and no longer the outside ribs, for everything that is sheet metal bending, if that helps...
I find that sheet metal work is very technical when we have not studied it (in BTS CPI for example, we do not see the notions of sheet metal). And despite good will, sometimes you have to let the specialists do things. For my part, to have my developing checked, I learned to calculate my dimensions at the level of the neutral fiber, on the other hand at that time you need to know the bend radius.
I worked for a company where we did the cutting and folding in-house... Of course, I was lucky to only work on very thin sheet metal and with only one bending machine. But this is not always the case and depending on the machine or the Vé to use your odds are not the same.
For a job well done, I think it's better to pay a little more to the subcontractor (and I don't think he takes a lot more because he'll only do it once on your part) than to spend hours finding the right dimensions to develop it. And then if he has to touch up the dxf, then in his quote he necessarily provides a little margin for it. When quotating, don't forget to set the minimum bend radius either. .
Of course, bending on thin sheet metal and thick sheet metal is not the same.
We have 2 folding machines, one with a press and one with an apron.
We bend from 0.63 mm up to 10mm.
I use the K-factor method for sheet metal up to 4mm. Above this thickness I use the crease loss.
Whether you give the inner or outer sides does not change anything for your subcontractor as long as it is indicated "interior or exterior", he will calculate the developed himself according to his tooling