I tested 2 laptops before installing in a fixed station
the acer V5 with an hd4000 and a MacBook Pro 2010 with a windows partition I will say that the creation of the part is honorable but it is an i3 processor
the acer with Win8 reacted well but we forget the renders and the big assemblies. Advantage the graphics driver is on the solidworks site
The MacBook was the chosen solution for occasional use. (The unofficial 80/20)
For me, if you don't take a mobile station (the ones described by gt22) you shouldn't expect miracle solutions.
I remain persuaded by the use of an ssd instead of a 15000rpm and minimum i7 processor with plenty of RAM (8GB min)
For information on a dell 1550 station we had replaced a quadro 4500 (the old one with 512mo) by a gtx630 1gb ... We put the quadro back
The choice of graphics card is very relevant because it is an essential component for the use of SolidWorks which requires a large graphics resource.
The most important thing in your choice is to have a card supported by SolidWorks, for this you need a graphics card with the Open GL language (quadro category at Nvidia), they are different from the Direct X language which is used for video games (GeForce category at Nvidia).
Both solutions will not be suitable for SolidWorks:
- The integrated Intel HD 4000 graphics card, this is not a graphics card but a chipset, so it is very light for the use of SolidWorks.
- The GeForce GTX645 or GT730M are not supported, working with the direct X language.
what I would recommend for standard use of SolidWorks with a mobile workstation would be the Nvidia K3000M.