Hello community.
Is it possible to have on the same model, a configuration with a sketch repetition, and another without?
I haven't figured out how to assign a configuration to a repeat. If I delete the repetition from one config, it deletes it from all the configs.
Hello,
Normally if you put repetition 0 or 1 to test and affect only the desired configuration it should work...
Hello.
The thing is that I don't see any "configuration..." in the repeat options 
When you double click on the function where the sketch repeat is located; The number of occurrences appears and there it seems to me that if you double click on it you have a window that opens or you can type the number and at the end of the line you will have an arrow and if you click on it you can choose
I don't have the pc on anymore, I'll look tomorrow morning
So thank you for the info because for a repetition of 2 or more occurrences it works, but not in my case; I want to go from 1 occurrence to 2, except that we can't set a value less than 2 
I tell you, humans have only one goal; Prevent humans from moving forward!!
I remember how I had worked around the problem, in the surface there is a function delete the face and I had removed the 1st hole of the repetition and make a repetition of the function by linking the two options)double click on the function repetition to delete the face and there you take the number of occurrences and you put a = and you double click on your function or the sketch repetition what is and select the number and there the two are linked and you will only have to activate / deactivate the delete face function according to your need. I hope you understand what I'm writing because for me it's clear in my head 
but when I look outside it's not very clear 
Hello
I hate sketch rehearsals.
If you can replace it with a normal repetition it will be easier.
Hello
I believe that during a repetition of a sketch or a function, the value cannot be less than 2.
On the other hand, what you can try is to make a room family table where you can delete the functions you don't need thanks to " $ETAT@Name of your function "
In the case of the table above, in my " Default " configuration, the function is solved so active
In my " test " configuration the function is removed
In the same way where you can remove/activate the material removal function
If you need I can send you the part.
Kind regards
Hello @ac_cobra_427 @stefbeno @q.nassoy Thank you for your answers.
It's surprising that this story is so complicated 
I'll still test your methods, but I'm starting to doubt the relevance of my use of sketch repetition for a configuration.
In the meantime, here are some details that may inspire.
The idea is to have a panel (whose profile is being studied) of radial fans, with different combinations of diameters, arrangement and quantity.
So I wanted to create the configurations (141412, 141214, 121414, ...), of which here is the 121414, i.e. the 12cm + a repeated 14cm:
But I want to be able to have configurations with 1 or 2 fans, like 1214 but also 1414 (without 12).
Do you think there is a better way to do this?
Finally the problem, as @q.nassoy wrote, is just that a repetition (whatever it is) cannot have 1 as a number of instances.
So the right method is to make a function by size whose position is configured, associated with a repeat function whose step and quantity you configure and the deleted state if qty 1.
And personally, it's not one function but 2 or 3 per size: the removal of circular matter, a hole and a repetition (if you're sure you'll only ever have 4 holes you can save it)
Would there be a list of everything that can be assigned to configurations?
Normally all functions and all dimensions
Hello
Nb occurrences 1 it works in sketch mode but not in function mode. In other words, it works 1 occ repetition of a circle for example but not 1 cylinder.
And that's where it gets twisted. In sketch mode, it works on one condition. You should not directly create 1 occ. But create at least two occs then go through the config table and replace 2occ with 1 occ. This method does not work in function mode.
But I would go about it differently in this case.
I would create 3 blocks in a single sketch (12,14 and 14). I create 3 independent kidnappings. Then the config that activates / deactivates the removal. Blocks because they are easily moveable.
Very interesting method @soring thank you.
Is it possible to switch construction lines to solid lines and vice versa, from one configuration to another?
The idea would be to have a sketch with 3x 12, with their entities in build mode or normal, and then apply a single removal.
And the same with a 2x 14 sketch.
I would toggle the mode of the lines concerned so that they are under construction or not depending on the configuration.
I understand but I don't think so. That's why I proposed individual removals because it can create a large number of variants with only 1 sketch and 3 extrusions.
But to use the entire sketch without having to select an area, I think you need to use 3 independent sketches of each block.
I don't know of a method to switch between construction line and solid.
Hello.
So, I ended up figuring out how to handle the problem, always with the goal of making it as simple as possible. I come up with 2 solutions, each as simple and viable as the other.
The first, simply taking advantage of the fact that an abduction applied to entities outside the boundaries of a body ignores these entities.
It is then enough to have a single sketch with all the diameters, repeated at their maximum quantity (on this 3x12 and 2x14 project).
Then to apply a removal to this sketch.
And since what is outside is ignored, by playing only on the placement of the entities and the spacing between their repetitions, I can get all combinations, and assign them to the configurations...
Second solution, which takes up the previous principle but this time plays on the number of occurrences (via tip from @ac_cobra_427 thank you).
So, you will tell me " we cannot have less than 2 occurrences ", indeed. Unless they are spread over the 2 axes!
With 2 occurrences in X, we can go down to only 1 in Y. So with copy X out of bounds (and therefore ignored), we are allowed to put Y=1 and we will have only one visible occurrence.
(I'll illustrate this second case later)
Hello @here
As promised, here is the illustration of the second solution, and even better, I improved it but outright 
Video explanations:
Hoping to be clear enough and not too messy. Let me know.
Kind regards
