I have a problem (recurrent one at that), while I'm working on a MEP (with cross-sectional views, details, breaks), I often have a cross-sectional view that... bug?
The dimensions placed previously go back in front of the hatching without creating the white halo checked in the option.
It's a bit problematic because the plan becomes illegible and is irretrievable, understand by this that the only solution that worked for me was... Delete the view. Not very cost-effective in terms of time.
I would like to point out that only one of the cross-sectional views is impacted, the others do exactly what the parameters ask of them.
I'm afraid not, the plan is finished and allows the entire realization of our product, not sure that my boss sees the dissemination of such a plan and its 3D in a good light;)
For your information, I think it's due to a graphic problem, since the problem has "moved" from the view, putting back the white halo on the section that was causing the problem but, by removing the one from the other view :/
I usually have this problem on large-scale plans, once it starts to be well filled. In the early days of the MEP, no problems, on the other hand, as soon as the plan gets complicated, I get this kind of graphical bugs: edges that disappear, blurred views, hatching that doesn't fade.
I just saw that my plan which was at 8MB has just gone back to 6MB, I didn't remove any views, it just went back to "normal" on its own.
@ac Cobra 427: I also thought like that before, but now the problem comes up a lot and I don't have time to wait for SW to hide the hatching. And if it was a link problem, the view next to it should be impacted, right?
I've had this problem for a while, but since it was coming back, I never took the term to ask seriously, but now, the plan is finished, I can't print it because the hatching that doesn't erase... it's not great for the readability of the plan:)
