From there to understanding that the mistake was that the function works in 2022, there is only one step 
5 Likes
I would like to thank VISIATIV for offering us this space to let off steam and above all thank you to DS for nourishing our critical thinking. Unfortunately, it also offers us the possibility of irreversible critical obesity. 
3 Likes
After on the 2020 the sp5 brought me better, not necessarily more stable, no less, not yet enough hindsight on it, (to put into perspective, the 2020 is already a very stable version), and I would have to retest bugs to see if it fixed them.
All this to say that for my text problem, it may have been just my fault or the context, or that the machine hadn't been rebooted for several months. I will try this again.
1 Like
@Cyril_f . This remark is very true. We only moved to 2023 sp5 a few weeks ago (we decided a few years ago in our design office to always be " late " to at least one version hoping that it is complete) and we still see improvements that are positive (but you still have to stumble upon them by chance) and others that make you waste time (example: the new window and its manipulations for geometric tolerances... that she will ... And the context menu on drawings, which appears for some types of dimensions and not others...) And it continues... The main thing is the dividends for investors, not the n+1 version which is perfectly operational from sp1, after a discovery sp0. We have a good back to the BEs...
2 Likes
Hello
So I won't bet on that. Resellers for fairly large BEs have always recommended not to migrate before SP3. In fact, we migrate SP5 n-1 every year because our installations are packaged
1 Like
I think you misinterpreted my last sentence.
But for most of the transitions to the sp3 mini and n-1 or n-2 versions, we agree.
2 Likes
