Need Help: Massive Displacements in 3D Truss Simulation due to Disconnected Joints

Hi everyone,

I am a senior Mechanical Engineering student currently diving into SolidWorks Simulation on my own. I have run into a frustrating roadblock with a structural analysis, and I would be incredibly grateful for any advice or pointers from the more experienced users here.

The Setup:

  • Model: 3D transmission tower created using a 3D sketch and Weldments (square tubing).
  • Study: Static Linear Analysis.
  • Elements: Configured primarily as Truss elements

The Problem: At several intersections—especially where diagonals cross in an « X Â» or at the main frame corners—SolidWorks is failing to create a single, unified magenta (connected) joint. Instead, the so





lver generates multiple uncoupled joints in the same physical space, flagging them as yellow.

Hi guillee_05,
And welcome to the VIsiativ forum, for me the problem comes from the model of the welded structure, at the level of the adjustment.

Get this idea, and tell me something.

And it's also a solidworks for teaching.

See you soon Allan.

AR.

Good morning and welcome,

I think the design is the problem. The feet can't adjust like you say @A_R ,

The functions of SolidWorks are quite sensitive if you do not respect a manufacturing and design reality.

In addition, your cross reinforcements (4 tubes) as you have designed them do not absorb the forces properly, they are weakened in their center.

You have to prioritize your structure and your reinforcements. A tube (diagonal), and two tubes completing the cross. Even there I think it's not the best.

Don't hesitate to shift the belt from the first stage as the apui of the reinforcements.
image

How are the feet fixed or connected to the ground?

Good luck

1 Like

Hello,

Sometimes you have to add knots artificially. For example, for a reinforcement " X ", 2 beams are not enough! You need 4 with a common knot in the center.

This is a beam structure calculation, so we skip the fittings, don't bother with beam adjustments.

1 Like

Hello @icome
Isn't it because there are 4 tubes (X) that this one reacts like this?

Indeed, the pink dot shows a definite node in the center of the " X "
You would have to see the model to understand the forces applied and the directions of travel.

2 Likes

Hello,

On this kind of structure, the beam mesh seems logical but with the computing power of current computers, a mesh and volume calculation although longer will avoid this kind of problem of connection in the corners which can allow the overall to save time.
If we do tubular structure analysis all day long, this is not necessarily true (but we will find the right mesh solutions).

It is also possible to do mixed: keep the corners welded in volume (or only those that are problematic) and the beam lengths. On the other hand, this will greatly complicate the creation of the calculation model.