I think it's madness to do rehearsals
the plastering of an appearance as I did on page 1 (attached file on SW 2012)
is in my opinion 100 times better if only for visuals
but hey
See this tutorial to understand and perform the least heavy repetitions
http://www.lynkoa.com/tutos/3d/les-repetitions-sous-solidworks
@+ ;-))
Hello
Fully agree 200% with @GT22.
@+
@gt22, I'm still a big fool... After once the part is transformed into a step and reinserted into the assembly it takes less space.
The advantage I have is to have transparency and to see the elements underneath during the situation.
Edit: @coyotte it's not that I don't agree.
with an appearance too you can see what you want
just put the support of the appearance in transparency RIGHT?
I find it hard to understand I think?????
well that's what I think it all depends on the size and the patterns
@+ ;-))
@gt22 .. oops I hadn't thought about transparency
edit: I attach the step file of the assembly for those who need a Chinese laser machine grid ....
For my part, I'll post the part next week when the PC is finished:)
@ Aurélien Fives and it's hard to rehearse
you want us to send you ram bars by chropost to go + fast ;-))
A function repeat test here
attached file wait for loading time ;-(
@+ ;-))
@gt22 down the c is the hair test to show that a pc is good or not ....
the same about the same
except
the size of a whole sheet 2500x1200
which was not the case in the previous message
in apparenece and translucent support piece
I made a red boss on one side to show the transparency
See the attached file below
@+ ;-))
@gt22, the day I get Solidworks, I'll look at all these parts ;)
On my side, 8GB of RAM, intel Core i7 - It managed to do half the plate and when I asked it to double the occurrences, it made me understand that I shouldn't push . . .
@Aurelien me i7 3.4 with 16GB of ram and everything in SSD and apart from the @GT22 file it didn't crash
On the other hand I'm going to do a honeycomb cutting test on a plexi plate to see what it looks like using the repeating file
and your plate is what size and the repeats are what sizes
for the repetition of my honeycomb parts in volume
_ I have 3025 repetitions reconstruction time 250.37 seconds
HPZ 400 station
_proc Xeon W 3565 3.2 Ghz
_12 giga of RAM
a 250G SSD for system and programmed
Storage Other Disks
@+ ;-))
@ gerald you crashed with your I7
via your comm
@Aurelien me i7 3.4 with 16GB of ram and everything in SSD and apart from the @GT22 file it didn't crash
and you have 16 Giga of ram
me with 12 of ram it passes without blemish
but the proc is a Xeon see message above
So the proc has its importance and not the least if I'm not mistaken
very interesting to know ;-)
@+ ;-))
Hey not at all, I'm the little player with 8GB, that's Gerald's config!
[edit] Oops, I didn't see that you were quoting Gerald's message... So much for me:)
@ aurélien no it can't be you since you're still looking for a log that holds up if I'm not mistaken.
at least for the time being SW is fine despite everything ;-)
and if you work properly with it you can go very, very far
But as they say, he who takes care of his horse goes a long way
@+ ;-))
Wow, you scare me with the configurations . . .
Our design office is equipped with: Dell precision T3500 - Xeon - W350 2.80 GHz - 6 GB RAM
Is it comparable (approximately) to your @gt22 configuration?
(I'm asking this because we're still on AutoCAD and the migration to Solidworks or Inventor should be done within 1 year)
Yes @gt22 it crashed, but in defense of intel I'm sw2014 which is very greedy in RAM....
Is it your xeon?
me it's an i7 4770 which has only 8MB of cache
for SW to do well
you need a proc that runs at least at 3Ghz with a pro card
12/16 giga of RAM
preferably an SSD for the operation and programs
An example of a station of the day that works with a good proc
http://www.axemble.com/store/fr/station-haut-de-gamme.html
@+ ;-))
@ Gerald looks up, I posted it in my previous posts
w 3565
it's true that I'm still on SW 2012 premium
@+ ;-))