I tried to create a custom prop in the room, it doesn't work any better, either by calling the prop directly in the equation or by creating a column and then calling the column.
Another option would be to put the text in a column and hide the line between the cells but I haven't seen anything that allows this kind of manipulation.
@remrem: At what level will the property thus created be at what level? I'm not used to using Smart Props;
@Sylk: You mean in the equations? There is no possibility to make equations in the MEP (to my knowledge) and in the assembly, SW does not want a string when I create a global variable.
I guess then that there is no choice, you have to proceed by row with a cell (=D2" cte") with D2 corresponding to the corresponding quantity cell, this allows to keep the dynamic aspect provided that you do not insert new columns because the sw table and unlike excel does not keep the (identifiers!) of this columns;)
Well in fact the equation solver in the nomenclatures is totally buggy... column names (No ARTICLE, QTE, etc.) return a null value instead of the value. So the QTE appears "invisible" in front of the PCS. Impossible to calculate anything with it. If I ask QTY +0 it shows 0, since null+0=0. If we concatenate null and "pcs" it displays "pcs". Etc.
Big bug. Too bad because your problem was solved in 5 seconds.
And in response to @Lynk it doesn't work with the cell either, D2"pcs" is invalid and the cell is reset to its initial value (same as leaving the equation field empty).
I had already tried 'QTE' +0' 'PCS' as said above, QTE is zero, and doesn't work either... and precisely all the alternatives of concatenations, calculations, conditions. Without success.
On the other hand! I just hit that it only works if all the assembly is complete. Adding a part does not count it correctly in the BOM, since the QTE column is renamed. Logic.
I think the easiest way is to do the same thing but leaving the original QTE, named as such, and to add the point on the new column. There it should work fully. I'm going to test that.