No worries, I'll try to be more explicit next time
What surprises me is that the expression 'QTE'+0{}" PCS" I had tested it in one condition but strangely didn't give anything, so I didn't retest it out of condition. While 'QTE'+0" PCS" I had tested it everywhere, so your answer intrigued @Lynk so I wanted to check again, nothing better. So I tried with the concat in addition this time. In fact, it was your answer that pushed me to retest to finally arrive at the solution, I admit it. Sorry if that's what you were implying, I didn't understand it like that :/ What I understood is that at your place 'QTE'+0' PCS" worked. Without really surprising me since your version didn't seem to react like mine.
1 Like