"Welding" of 2 half pieces

Hello everyone.
I am currently creating a radio-controlled trimaran hull.
I have 2 half shells cut in the center by the length. I assembled the 2 parts and I recorded it in . SLDPRT.
Depending on the type of display style type, the connection between the 2 parts is visible or not.
Question: When printing, will the link line be visible or not?
Thank you


Boat2.SLDPRT (938.1 KB)

Hello

I would have imagined you working on a longship rather :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

For printing, what you see on the screen will be visible on the paper. So in line mode the lines will be visible and so will your demarcation.

On the other hand, for a weld I would chamfer the edges to be welded, for a better weld (depends on the type of weld). Which would at the same time make the demarcation visible even without the line display mode.

Hello Sylk.
It is a 50 cm radio-controlled sailboat... Made of plastic.
The question I ask myself is: from the .sldprt I will create a Step file, to print the parts.will the joining line of the 2 half shells be visible?

Again, it will depend on the software used to print the steps, whether there is a " visible outlines" mode or not.

Hello, it depends on the settings of the slicer, some people neglect the junctions of this type and do the sewing.

1 Like

Hello @Scofield as he was talking about the display style, I thought he was talking about paper printing... but you put me in doubt.

If he's talking about 3D printing (extrusion, to be exact) and the spacing between the edges is 0 then it's not even that the slicer neglects it, it's that for him it's simply the same face, so 0 visible seams.
If the spacing is greater than 0, it will seek to separate the edges. However, there is a setting in the slicer to define the max spacing to be considered as the same face, therefore to be closed: " Closing radius  ". 

Coin with a deviation of 0.5:
image

Sliced part with a smaller closing radius out of the way:
image

Sliced part with a closing radius greater than or equal to the gap:
image

1 Like

Thank you both.
I'll do a print test on a one-centimeter slice when it's all over.
Have a good weekend friends.

1 Like

Your faces are coincidental, so even with a closing radius set to 0 the separation will not be visible.


On the other hand, depending on the type of 3D printing (FDM on my images) you will have to manage seams (in white) that you can position where you prefer:


They will be more or less visible depending on the settings and the machine.

Yes, that's what it's all about, the " joins " are configurable, alignment, offset, ..., it all depends
of the slicer used

Yes, for the seams, I don't worry because if everything is ok I'll still sand it to get a correct surface.

What material will you print in, what " thickness/profile " and with which printer?

PETG, 1.2 mm wall, on Bambu X1C.

yes, the Petg is good for this kind of part, with nozzle of how much and how much wire output, in other words printing in 0.06, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3 etc?

I've been doing 3D printing for 6 years. More than 50 reels sold.
Maybe 8 kilos of PLA, everything else in PETG, ABS, ASA, etc...
Always in nozzle 0.4.
Layers? Varies according to project.

Hmm, PETG doesn't sand well, and it would tend to make the appearance worse.

Yes but resists " time ", although there are better, nylon ..., it's sure that the visual result with the PETG is not great!!

ditto, in a nozzle of 0.4/0.6, my printer is close to 3000 hours

The rendering of PETG for this float is more than enough. It's a material that lends itself very well to this use, and I wasn't saying not to use it but simply that sanding is not a good idea (well except to paint or varnish the part it can help with the adhesion but a primer can be enough). It is better to use a blade. If the seams are too unsightly, shaving them closely will give a better result.
That being said, with the right settings, there is a way to make them clean enough not to require post-processing.

3000h?! :face_with_raised_eyebrow: That's a lot. Mine shows 5h with a 0.4 nozzle and layers of 0.3 at an average speed of 200mm/s. 7h with the supports. And even then, I didn't even try to optimize the print settings for this model.

It sands well if you do it well. By taking his time. Because I plan to put on a primer and paint. On a sanded surface, primers and paint hold much better. Even in layers of 0.12, some rays are less smooth than the rest. We need to retouch. Some friends do this in PLA. Not for me.
As for the 0.3 layers, even in TPU I don't do. Too rude!
I close the debate here, which is a departure from the main topic of Solidwors.
Thank you and have a good week everyone.

Continued in the next issue!!
bs to you too