This is a problem that I have never been able to solve until now.
Put a screw in a tapped hole and make a cut; As I extract the screw from the cut, we have a correct representation of a screw in a tapped hole (on the left on the attached image). So far, so good.
But as soon as I also have to cut the screw, the thread and the thread are confused, the hatching overlaps, in short it's nonsense from a technical drawing point of view. The screw no longer dominates the tapped hole. (on the right on the attached image).
Does anyone have a simple and elegant way to deal with the problem? Or do you have to do long and evasive manipulations to hide lines, erase hatching and redo everything?
The representation of the hatching on the image on the right is correct because the hatching goes to the strong lines never the fine lines, so there is nothing at all to do for my part
It seems to me that in your image on the right the male part has no thread. So that's why you have a crossover of hatching. When there is a tap+thread mounting, SolidWorks handles hatching well (just like other software, by the way!).
Indeed alain, I have the same behavior. I don't know if another 3D software does better, but in this case the parts are interfering and the 2 outer contours (strong lines) are visible. It is therefore normal for the hatching to stop at the said strong lines. So for me the representation can only be like the one indicated if we cut the 2 pieces. We will have the same representation if the section is in the other direction (radial).
Unfortunately, I don't really have any idea except for:
- uncheck the "Automatic hatching" option when creating the section view and do them manually.
- or to put a note in order to warn.
- or, when creating the tapped hole via the "Drilling Wizard" function, take the "Thread removed" option, so there will be no more interference between the part and the tapped hole (see image).
To answer JMSAVOYAT, from memory, Solidedge knows how to manage this problem of thread representation. I think that the developers of Solidworks didn't want to bother with this problem, besides, the option to show thread lines is not automatic, you have to do it manually which says a lot!
To answer Alain, I don't think there is a miracle solution to this problem, apart from doing it manually as mentioned earlier. Good luck.
@Rim-b, "I think that the developers of Solidworks didn't want to bother with this problem, besides, the option to display thread lines is not automatic, you have to do it manually which says a lot!". Where did you see that thread marks had to be displayed manually? Once the document options (and all options!) are set, simply save the document templates. The advantage of customizable options is precisely to satisfy a maximum of users. But not knowing Solidedge, I can't compare.
I hadn't seen that you could configure the display of thread lines automatically in an assembly drawing. On the other hand, how do you do it, I can't find the right option for that?
I continue to think that since solidworks has existed, the problem mentioned by Alain should have (could) have been solved. The cross-sectional representation of a screw in a thread is one of the first basics I was taught in drawing.