Doesn't the history of the asm sw read as a step and updated in creo imply that you keep a solidworks anyway? In which case it is no longer a choice between 2 but rather a decision of complementarity. No?
(I admit I haven't read everything, sorry if it's an irrelevant remark)
No, it's just a possibility to work on the 2. =>or you are in a relationship with a BE who works under SW =>or if you change software, it allows you to make a smooth transition.
When you do file/open, you can choose which configuration to open but also create an empty one in which all the components are in the deleted state (sorry, I don't have SW on hand to take screenshots).
in the meantime I invite you to try to make this Creo tutorial under SW, it's not that simple but you can do it. (you have to be cunning as usual as for the 2 holidays at the end, I don't know if we can do the same kind of selection under SW)
I see above all that he did like me, work on a neighborhood entirely and then repeat / merge, unlike Creo. on the other hand, it made a smooth interior and not a shell.
bjr, Here I am the owner of a Full Creo license and hotline access for a period of one month. All I have to do is test. I had a mini training of 4 hours for the handling nothing rocket science on this side. During this training I have already noted both positive and negative points. I will move slowly on the subject and I will give you an update regularly. May the force be with you. ps: off topic I just came back from Disney word in Florida where I was able to go to the Star Wars land it is absolutely incredible I saw the falcon and took a verse at the cantina absolutely magical.
I'm doing a study to go from SW to TSV7. to date I have been able to test a little TOPSOLID and for the little I have done I am very satisfied but I have never noticed any slowness that you describe... Can you elaborate on what a " formatting feature" is?
(Welcome back from your time in space!) do you know if they sell an extra PDM? (integrated into the basic solution like TOPSOLID would be a plus but I believe in it average )
Shaping functions = extrusion, profile limiting, etc. It's been a long time now, but I remember that it was mostly the parameter declaration that got me drunk: on SW, all dimensions are addressed like D1@Esquisse1, D3@Extrusion2, etc. which it is possible to exploit directly in an equation, whereas in TS, from memory, it was mandatory to declare the equivalent of a global variable in SW and it was tedious.
Hello Where are you in your thinking and testing? We have set up SW 2024. And we've seen a real change in performance, opening and recording. I've been working with SW for almost 20 years and I admit that I don't remember such a significant evolution. Have you made a comparison?